Skip to content
Cart

Your Cart

×

You have 0 items in your cart.

Register Sign in Wishlist

Hybrid Warfare
Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present

$32.99 (G)

Peter R. Mansoor, James Lacey, Wayne E. Lee, Williamson Murray, Richard Hart Sinnreich, Daniel E. Sutherland, Marcus Jones, John Ferris, Noboru Yamaguchi, Karl Lowe
View all contributors
  • Date Published: July 2012
  • availability: Available
  • format: Paperback
  • isbn: 9781107643338
Average user rating
(1 review)

$ 32.99 (G)
Paperback

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Hardback, eBook


Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact collegesales@cambridge.org providing details of the course you are teaching.

Description
Product filter button
Description
Contents
Resources
Courses
About the Authors
  • Hybrid warfare has been an integral part of the historical landscape since the ancient world, but only recently have analysts – incorrectly – categorized these conflicts as unique. Great powers throughout history have confronted opponents who used a combination of regular and irregular forces to negate the advantage of the great powers' superior conventional military strength. As this study shows, hybrid wars are labor-intensive and long-term affairs; they are difficult struggles that defy the domestic logic of opinion polls and election cycles. Hybrid wars are also the most likely conflicts of the twenty-first century, as competitors use hybrid forces to wear down America's military capabilities in extended campaigns of exhaustion. Nine historical examples of hybrid warfare, from ancient Rome to the modern world, provide readers with context by clarifying the various aspects of conflicts and examining how great powers have dealt with them in the past.

    • Nine examples of hybrid war from the ancient world to the present
    • Introductory and concluding essays frame and analyse the special problems that hybrid war presents to great powers
    • Demonstrates the importance of understanding hybrid warfare for today's policy makers and military leaders
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    "… highly readable, cohesively organized, and enthusiastically recommended as an invaluable guide for understanding how previous antagonists have sought advantage with strategic combinations. It is suitable for serious students of military history, analysts of contemporary conflict, and professionals at the command and general staff college level."
    Small Wars Journal

    "The book achieves its ambitions in extending hybrid war in historical time and space, and of being a valuable starting point from which military professionals and historians can further explore the topic."
    Peter Layton, RUSI Journal

    "Hybrid Warfare will prove rewarding reading for anyone interested in the problem of 'irregular' warfare, providing much food for thought about what is likely to be the most common form of war in our century."
    A. A. Nofi, Strategypage

    "Hybrid Warfare will prove rewarding reading for anyone interested in the problem of 'irregular' warfare, providing much food for thought about what is likely to be the most common form of war in our century."
    The NYMAS Review

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    31st Aug 2014 by Robbo

    With the advent of the atomic bomb, pundits predicted that war had changed forever. The intervening years proved them wrong. Since the United States became embroiled in Iraq and Afghanistan in the first decade of the 21st Century, a new breed of analysts have now posited the emergence of a new type of war - with the appellation of ‘hybrid warfare.‘ In this small volume, the editors show that far from being an emerging form of conflict, hybrid warfare - the buzz phrase doing the rounds of the Pentagon - has existed for centuries, and that a failure to understand its character, complexity and, importantly, the nature of the societies waging it, has resulted in either defeat, or falling far short of the expectations originally intended. Those who have been successful, on the other hand, have left on long legacy of ill-feeling, and often hatred, amongst the conquered peoples. Hybrid warfare is defined as a conflict in which a belligerent employs both conventional and unconventional forces, such as irregulars, partisans, and guerrillas, and while not new, it presents Western armies with an increasingly difficult problem, should they become involved in one, as the boundaries of war become blurred. In nine essays ranging from the 1st Century AD to the American defeat in Vietnam, each written by a different historian, we are presented with a wide spectrum of such wars, across four continents and Ireland. Interesting though they are, in this reviewer’s opinion the opening essay on the Romans in Germania draws a long bow in placing the conflict in the hybrid warfare basket, and the example of Tyrone’s Rebellion 1594-1603, with a minor Spanish intervention, is more an example of a nascent hybrid war that was snuffed out before it could take hold. The remainder, however, provide fascinating studies of the brutality, complexity, and enormous difficulties confronting conventional forces fighting a ‘hybrid’ enemy. Much of the book addresses the British and American experience. Four essays describe Britain’s efforts, both in combatting hybrid forces successfully and unsuccessfully, and employing them to defeat an opponent. John Ferris’s ‘Small Wars and Great Games: The British Empire and Hybrid Warfare, 1700 - 1970’ covers a broad canvas, and concludes that overall the British have been remarkably successful at conducting and combatting this form of war. Three essays address the American experience - successfully conducting one during the American Revolution, and two of combatting it: successfully during the Civil War, and unsuccessfully in Vietnam. Rounding out the survey, are two fine essays on the Franco-Prussian War and the Second Sino- Japanese War. All are well written, informative studies, and each bring interesting perspectives to the subject. Together they provide a sound basis in understanding, or least attempting to understand the hybrid form of war, but as they clearly show, it is not a new transition confined to the first decade of the 21st Century. Williamson Murray’s ‘Conclusion’ draws together the threads of these studies, pulling out trends from a complex weave of factors that mark the nature of hybrid warfare. As with all his works, Murray’s perceptive and instructive writing eschews the theoretical, and esoteric approach, but is firmly rooted in the historical record, and the realities of past experience. One cannot but feel that Western societies, with their preference for quick wars, and steadily waning support for those that drag on, will increasingly fail to succeed in future hybrid wars. They are costly in resources, money and time, a point the British quickly recognised during the American Revolution, and hence concluded peace with the recalcitrant colonists. There is much to be learned from this fine book. Perhaps the biggest lesson, Murray concludes, is: ‘Do not fight a hybrid war unless the most fundamental interests of the state are at stake.‘ It is a most useful contribution to the study of war in its most difficult form.

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?

    ×

    Product details

    • Date Published: July 2012
    • format: Paperback
    • isbn: 9781107643338
    • length: 334 pages
    • dimensions: 229 x 152 x 20 mm
    • weight: 0.45kg
    • contains: 9 maps
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    Introduction:
    1. Hybrid warfare in history Peter R. Mansoor
    2. Conquering Germania: a province too far James Lacey
    3. Keeping the Irish down and the Spanish out: English strategies of submission in Ireland, 1594–1603 Wayne E. Lee
    4. The American revolution: hybrid war in America's past Williamson Murray
    5. That accursed Spanish war: the Peninsular War, 1807–14 Richard Hart Sinnreich
    6. The union's counter-guerrilla war, 1861–5 Daniel E. Sutherland
    7. Fighting 'this nation of liars to the very end': the German army in the Franco–Prussian War, 1870–1 Marcus Jones
    8. Small wars and great games: the British empire and hybrid warfare, 1700–1970 John Ferris
    9. An unexpected encounter with hybrid warfare: the Japanese experience in north China, 1937–45 Noboru Yamaguchi
    10. Hybrid war in Vietnam Karl Lowe
    Conclusion:
    11. What the past suggests Williamson Murray.

  • Editors

    Williamson Murray, Ohio State University
    Williamson Murray is Professor Emeritus of History at Ohio State University. At present he is a defense consultant and commentator on historical and military subjects in Washington. He is the author of War, Strategy, and Military Effectiveness and Military Adaptation in War (both Cambridge, 2011). He is co-editor of numerous books on military and international history, including The Shaping of Grand Strategy (with Richard Sinnreich and James Lacey, Cambridge, 2011), The Making of Peace (with James Lacey, Cambridge, 2008), The Past as Prologue (with Richard Hart Sinnreich, Cambridge, 2006), The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050 (with MacGregor Knox, Cambridge, 2001), Military Innovation in the Interwar Period (with Allan R. Millett, Cambridge, 1996) and The Making of Strategy (with Alvin Bernstein and MacGregor Knox, Cambridge, 1994).

    Peter R. Mansoor, Ohio State University
    Peter Mansoor is the General Raymond E. Mason, Jr Chair of Military History at Ohio State University. He assumed this position in 2008 after a twenty-six-year career in the United States Army that culminated in his service in Iraq as the executive officer to General David Petraeus, the commanding general of Multi-National Force in Iraq. He is the author of The GI Offensive in Europe: The Triumph of American Infantry Divisions, 1941–1945, which was awarded the Society for Military History's distinguished book award and the Army Historical Society's distinguished book award in 2000. He also wrote a memoir titled Baghdad at Sunrise: A Brigade Commander's War in Iraq (2008), which was awarded the Ohioana Library Association distinguished book award.

    Contributors

    Peter R. Mansoor, James Lacey, Wayne E. Lee, Williamson Murray, Richard Hart Sinnreich, Daniel E. Sutherland, Marcus Jones, John Ferris, Noboru Yamaguchi, Karl Lowe

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account

Cancel

Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email lecturers@cambridge.org

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.

Cancel

Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

×
Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.
×