Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist
Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action

Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action
Concepts, Crimes, and Courts

$110.00 (C)

Dennis Patterson, Michael S. Moore, Katrina Sifferd, Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov, Nick J. Davis, Michael S. Pardo, John Danaher, Pim Haselager, Giulio Mecacci, Peter Raynor, Joanna Glynn, Marion Godman, Elizabeth Shaw
View all contributors
  • Date Published: May 2018
  • availability: In stock
  • format: Hardback
  • isbn: 9781108428705

$ 110.00 (C)

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:

Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact providing details of the course you are teaching.

Product filter button
About the Authors
  • Law regulates human behaviour, a phenomenon about which neuroscience has much to say. Neuroscience can tell us whether a defendant suffers from a brain abnormality, or injury and it can correlate these neural deficits with criminal offending. Using fMRI and other technologies it might indicate whether a witness is telling lies or the truth. It can further propose neuro-interventions to 'change' the brains of offenders and so to reduce their propensity to offend. And, it can make suggestions about whether a defendant knows or merely suspects a prohibited state of affairs; so, drawing distinctions among the mental states that are central to legal responsibility. Each of these matters has philosophical import; is a neurological 'deficit' inculpatory or exculpatory; what is the proper role for law if the mind is no more than the brain; is lying really a brain state and can neuroscience really 'read' the brain? In this edited collection, leading contributors to the field provide new insights on these matters, bringing to light the great challenges that arise when disciplinary boundaries merge.

    • Covers both philosophical and practical implications, helping readers to draw considered conclusions
    • Written in an accessible way for those with no background in neuroscience, helping lawyers, philosophers and others understand the implications of neuroscience for the law
    • Includes insights about the conceptual limitations of neuroscience, helping readers to see the difficulties that arise when disciplinary boundaries merge
    Read more

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity


    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?


    Product details

    • Date Published: May 2018
    • format: Hardback
    • isbn: 9781108428705
    • length: 310 pages
    • dimensions: 235 x 157 x 21 mm
    • weight: 0.57kg
    • contains: 3 b/w illus.
    • availability: In stock
  • Table of Contents

    Part I. Conceptual Disputes: Brains as the Locus of Responsibility?:
    1. Neuroscience and the explanation of human action Dennis Patterson
    2. 'Nothing but a pack of neurons:' the moral responsibility of the human machine Michael S. Moore
    3. Non-eliminative reductionism: not the theory of mind some responsibility theorists want, but the one they need Katrina Sifferd
    4. Intention as non-observational knowledge: rescuing responsibility from the brain Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov
    5. Efficient causation and neuroscientific explanations of criminal action Nick J. Davis
    Part II. Epistemic Disputes: What does Neuroscience Tell Law about Responsibility?:
    6. Lying, deception, and fMRI: a critical update Michael S. Pardo
    7. Brain-based lie detection and the mereological fallacy: reasons for optimism John Danaher
    8. Is brain reading mind reading? Pim Haselager and Giulio Mecacci
    Part III. Implications for Courts and Defendants:
    9. Unlucky, bad, and the space in between: why criminologists should think more about responsibility Peter Raynor
    10. Neuroscience and the criminal jurisdiction: a new approach to reliability and admissibility in the courts of England and Wales Joanna Glynn
    11. Should individuals with psychopathy be compensated for their fearlessness? (Or how neuroscience matters for equality) Marion Godman
    12. The treatment of psychopathy: conceptual and ethical issues Elizabeth Shaw.

  • Editor

    Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov, University of Surrey
    Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov is Professor at the Centre for Legal Philosophy, School of Law, University of Surrey. She is the author of A Philosophy of Criminal Attempts (Cambridge, 2015) and A Natural Law Approach to Normativity (2007). Her recent and ongoing work aims to show that a proper grasp of mind and action is indispensable to a proper understanding of criminal responsibility.


    Dennis Patterson, Michael S. Moore, Katrina Sifferd, Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov, Nick J. Davis, Michael S. Pardo, John Danaher, Pim Haselager, Giulio Mecacci, Peter Raynor, Joanna Glynn, Marion Godman, Elizabeth Shaw

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account


Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner Please see the permission section of the catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.


Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.