Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice
$34.00 ( ) USD
- Author: Marc Jacob, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Frankfurt
Adobe eBook Reader
Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
Past cases are the European Court of Justice's most prominent tool in making and justifying the rulings and decisions which affect the everyday lives of more than half a billion people. Marc Jacob's detailed analysis of the use of precedents and case-based reasoning in the Court uses methods such as doctrinal scholarship, empirical research, institutional analysis, comparative law and legal theory in order to unravel and critique the how and why of the Court's precedent technique. In doing so, he moves the wider debate beyond received 'common law' versus 'civil law' figments and 'Eurosceptic' versus 'Euromantic' battle lines, and also provides a useful blueprint for assessing and comparing the case law practices of other dispute resolution bodies.Read more
- Helps readers appreciate the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as a political and judicial entity situated in a specific institutional context
- Critiques the ECJ's methods and suggests ways in which they could be strengthened, thereby providing much-needed academic sustenance to the classic but staid 'judicial activism' debate
- Proposes a way of thinking about judicial precedents and case-based reasoning that will appeal to anyone interested in courts and tribunals and dispute resolution, irrespective of the particular forum
Reviews & endorsements
"… provides a valuable and highly approachable exposition of the normativity of precedent (stare decisis) from both civil and common law perspectives to non-domestic international and EU law ones."
Suvi Sankari, Common Market Law ReviewSee more reviews
"[This book] presents a differentiated and multifaceted picture of the way in which the European Court approaches the question of precedent. Referring to, distinguishing, and overruling precedent are depicted as diverse and multifunctional techniques of legal reasoning. … Marc Jacob has written a highly insightful study, which will be of interest for anyone interested in precedent within the context of the European Union and beyond."
Mehrdad Payandeh, International Journal of Constitutional Law
"… provide[s] important insights into the use of precedents in the case law of international arbitral tribunals and the European Court of Justice."
Niels Petersen, European Journal of International Law
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: March 2014
- format: Adobe eBook Reader
- isbn: 9781139899321
- contains: 6 b/w illus.
- availability: This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.
Table of Contents
2. Setting precedents: law made in Luxembourg
3. Determining the essence of ECJ precedents
4. Precedent application by the ECJ
5. Avoiding ECJ precedents I: distinguishing
6. Avoiding ECJ precedents II: departing
7. ECJ precedents in context
8. The normativity of ECJ precedents
9. Conclusions and suggestions.
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×