Looking for an examination copy?
If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
This book treats problems in the epistemology of the law. Beginning with the premise that the principal function of a criminal trial is to find out the truth about a crime, Larry Laudan examines the rules of evidence and procedure that would be appropriate if the discovery of the truth were, as higher courts routinely claim, the overriding aim of the criminal justice system. Laudan mounts a systematic critique of existing rules and procedures that are obstacles to that quest. He also examines issues of error distribution by offering the first integrated analysis of the various mechanisms—the standard of proof, the benefit of the doubt, the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof—for implementing society’s view about the relative importance of the errors that can occur in a trial.Read more
- Hard-hitting critique of the current structure of criminal trials in Anglo-Saxon countries
- Examines the epistemology of law through evidence and procedure
- Challenges the conventional view that the fundamental role of courts is to discover truth
Reviews & endorsements
'Laudan has written an estimable book, one that deserves a wide audience. His arguments are of consistently high calibre and his conclusions are provocative.' Criminal Law and Philosophy
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: June 2006
- format: Hardback
- isbn: 9780521861663
- length: 256 pages
- dimensions: 229 x 152 x 19 mm
- weight: 0.55kg
- availability: Available
Table of Contents
1. Thinking about error in the law
2. The unraveling of reasonable doubt
3. Fixing the standard of proof
4. Innocence, the burden of proof, and the puzzle of affirmative defenses
5. Evaluating evidence and procedures
6. Silent defendants, silent witnesses, and lobotomized jurors
7. Confessions, poison fruit, and other exclusions
8. Double jeopardy and false acquittals: letting felons and judges off the hook?
9. Dubious motives for flawed rules: the clash between values.
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×