Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist

Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought

£22.99

  • Date Published: October 2015
  • availability: Available
  • format: Paperback
  • isbn: 9781107566880

£ 22.99
Paperback

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Hardback, eBook


Looking for an inspection copy?

This title is not currently available on inspection

Description
Product filter button
Description
Contents
Resources
Courses
About the Authors
  • As the first full-length study of twentieth-century American legal academics wrestling with the problem of free will versus determinism in the context of criminal responsibility, this book deals with one of the most fundamental problems in criminal law. Thomas Andrew Green chronicles legal academic ideas from the Progressive Era critiques of free will-based (and generally retributive) theories of criminal responsibility to the midcentury acceptance of the idea of free will as necessary to a criminal law conceived of in practical moral-legal terms that need not accord with scientific fact to the late-in-century insistence on the compatibility of scientific determinism with moral and legal responsibility and with a modern version of the retributivism that the Progressives had attacked. Foregrounding scholars' language and ideas, Green invites readers to participate in reconstructing an aspect of the past that is central to attempts to work out bases for moral judgment, legal blame, and criminal punishment.

    • The first study of legal thought regarding free will and criminal responsibility in the United States in the twentieth century
    • Presenting legal scholars' unique vantage point, this book traces concerns regarding the most fundamental issues in criminal law
    • Discusses the history of attempts to balance Americans' views about guilt and retribution with philosophical, political, and scientific theories of human behavior
    Read more

    Reviews & endorsements

    'Thomas Green's Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought delivers what its title promises, namely, over a hundred years of history of the debate among American legal academics and philosophers over the implications for criminal responsibility of the free will/determinism issue. Green comprehensively and critically surveys the views of all of the major and not-so-major contributors to this debate, from Roscoe Pound to Michael Moore and beyond. A tour de force.' Lawrence A. Alexander, University of San Diego School of Law

    'A fascinating and illuminating study of the ways in which twentieth-century American legal academics (those concerned with both metaphysical truth and its implications for practical policy) grappled with the problems of free will and criminal responsibility. Green allows the authors he studies to speak for themselves, and thus brings out in admirably clear detail the contours and shifts of the debates within and between successive generations of thinkers.' Antony Duff, University of Minnesota Law School

    'This deeply researched account of how twentieth-century legal thinkers have engaged with questions of freedom and responsibility is remarkable in its coverage and attention to detail. Green's close readings of the American texts - some well-known, many long-forgotten - and his careful explication of their contexts and meanings, vividly portrays how academic lawyers have struggled to make law's categories fit for practical use and also compatible with philosophical and scientific conceptions.' David Garland, New York University

    'Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought is a brilliantly imaginative and utterly original work of legal history. In it, Thomas Andrew Green surveys a century of American criminal law scholarship as, at bottom, a continuing and persistent conversation about the existence of free will. We learn of the paradoxes and the surprising twists and turns that swirled through debates over the nature and the meaning of criminal responsibility. No one interested in the legal or moral history of the twentieth century can afford to miss this book. Indeed, it will become a crucial resource for everyone engaged with moral, legal, or political thought.' Hendrik Hartog, Princeton University

    'Thomas Green has written a brilliant, comprehensive, and fair-minded history of a century-long effort to ignore, reconcile, understand, and obfuscate a contradiction that lies at the heart of criminal responsibility. This is intellectual history at its very best. Green lets the participants in this crucial debate speak for themselves. His treatment of their arguments is unfailingly generous, thoughtful, fair, and wise.' Louis Michael Seidman, Georgetown University Law Center

    'Green brilliantly reconstructs the long twentieth century's academic debate on the morality of punishing individual criminals in an age of determinism. While his intellectual protagonists ultimately made their peace with punishment, the questions that haunted them about responsibility, freedom, and the morality of coercion are bedrock problems for modern law and certain to return in new forms as determinism is reinforced by neuroscience and genomics. A fundamental contribution to the history of American jurisprudence.' Jonathan Simon, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law

    'The fruit of years of reflection by our leading historian of criminal law on the most fundamental, and toughest, problem in the field. No one with a serious interest in the challenges of modern justice can afford to miss this book.' James Q. Whitman, Yale Law School

    'Green chronicles legal academic ideas in the United States, from the Progressive Era critiques of free-will-based (and generally retributive) theories of criminal responsibility, to the mid-century acceptance of the idea of free will as necessary, to a criminal law conceived of in practical moral-legal terms that need not accord with scientific fact, to the late-in-century insistence on the compatibility of scientific determinism with moral and legal responsibility and with a modern version of the retributivism that the Progressives had attacked.' Law and Social Enquiry

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    Not yet reviewed

    Be the first to review

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?

    ×

    Product details

    • Date Published: October 2015
    • format: Paperback
    • isbn: 9781107566880
    • length: 520 pages
    • dimensions: 234 x 155 x 30 mm
    • weight: 0.81kg
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    Introduction
    Part I. Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in the Age of Pound:
    1. The fin de siècle: Speranza
    2. The Progressive Era: Pound
    3. Pound eclipsed?: the conversation of the mid to late 1920s
    Part II. Conventional Morality and the Rule of Law: Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in the Forgotten Years, 1930–60:
    4. Scientific positivism, utilitarianism, and the wages of conventional morality, 1930–7
    5. Entr'acte: intimations of freedom, 1937–53
    6. Durham v. US, the moral context of the law, and reinterpretations of the Progressive inheritance, 1954–8
    Part III. Freedom, Criminal Responsibility, and Retributivism in Late Twentieth-Century Legal Thought:
    7. The foundations of neo-retributivism, 1957–76
    8. Rethinking the freedom question, 1978–94
    9. Competing perspectives at the close of the twentieth century
    Conclusion.

  • Author

    Thomas Andrew Green, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    Thomas Andrew Green is the John P. Dawson Collegiate Professor of Law emeritus and Professor of History emeritus at the University of Michigan. He served as editor or coeditor of Studies in Legal History, the book series of the American Society for Legal History, from 1986 to 2011. Green has also served as president of the American Society for Legal History, has been a Fellow of the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences, and has held fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. One of his previous publications, Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury, 1200–1800 (1985), and the present volume together form the framework of his current project, a study of the relationship between ideas about the jury and ideas about criminal responsibility in the English and American past. That project will complete Green's work on two aspects of freedom in Anglo-American criminal justice history: political liberty and free will.

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account

Cancel

Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email lecturers@cambridge.org

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.

Cancel

Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

×
Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.
×