Other available formats:
Looking for an examination copy?
This title is not currently available for examination. However, if you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact email@example.com providing details of the course you are teaching.
Starting from Kant's striking question 'What is orientation in thinking?', this book argues that the main challenge facing global normative theorising lies in its failure to acknowledge its conceptual inadequacies. We do not know how to reason globally; instead, we tend to apply our domestic political experiences to the global context. Katrin Flikschuh argues that we must develop a form of global reasoning that is sensitive to the variability of contexts: rather than trying to identify a uniquely shareable set of substantive principles, we need to appreciate and understand local reasons for action. Her original and incisive study shows how such reasoning can benefit from the open-ended nature of Kant's systematic but non-dogmatic philosophical thinking, and from reorientation from a domestic to a non-domestic frame of thought. It will appeal to all those interested in global moral issues, as well as to Kant scholars.Read more
- Puts forward a fresh approach to the idea of global justice, showing how neglected non-Western philosophical perspectives can contribute to global normative thinking
- Presents a new way of engaging Kant's method of philosophical thinking in the global justice debate, challenging mainstream Kantianism
- Explores how our global reasoning often fails as a result of its conceptual inadequacies, and how it must develop more awareness of local context without simply identifying a universal set of shared principles
Not yet reviewed
Be the first to review
Review was not posted due to profanity×
- Date Published: November 2017
- format: Hardback
- isbn: 9781107003811
- length: 262 pages
- dimensions: 235 x 156 x 19 mm
- weight: 0.5kg
- availability: In stock
Table of Contents
1. Conceptual loss in global political thinking
2. On the moral necessity of states
3. Non-individualist 'innate right'
4. Re-orienting normative global thinking
5. Progress without history
6. Human rights for ancestors?
7. The state as a failed universal
Sorry, this resource is locked
Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister Sign in
You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.Continue ×