Skip to content
Register Sign in Wishlist

Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act

£93.00

Award Winner
  • Date Published: May 2009
  • availability: Available
  • format: Hardback
  • isbn: 9780521761000
Average user rating
(1 review)

£ 93.00
Hardback

Add to cart Add to wishlist

Other available formats:
Paperback, eBook


Looking for an inspection copy?

This title is not currently available on inspection

Description
Product filter button
Description
Contents
Resources
Courses
About the Authors
  • Under the Human Rights Act, British courts are for the first time empowered to review primary legislation for compliance with a codified set of fundamental rights. In this book, Aileen Kavanagh argues that the HRA gives judges strong powers of constitutional review, similar to those exercised by the courts under an entrenched Bill of Rights. The aim of the book is to subject the leading case-law under the HRA to critical scrutiny, whilst remaining sensitive to the deeper constitutional, political and theoretical questions which underpin it. Such questions include the idea of judicial deference, the constitutional status of the HRA, the principle of parliamentary sovereignty and the constitutional division of labour between Parliament and the courts. The book closes with a sustained defence of the legitimacy of constitutional review in a democracy, thus providing a powerful rejoinder to those who are sceptical about judicial power under the HRA.

    • Clarifies how the Human Rights Act has modified traditional doctrines of statutory interpretation through in-depth examination of the leading case-law on the compatibility of primary legislation with Convention rights
    • Addresses key questions of constitutional theory underlying the application of the HRA to primary legislation, such as the idea of judicial deference, proportionality, parliamentary sovereignty, the separation of powers and the legitimacy of constitutional review in a democracy
    • Contributes to the academic debate about the nature of UK public law and the role of the courts within it by providing a sustained riposte to those who claim that judges' powers to review primary legislation for compliance with Convention rights are illegitimate
    Read more

    Awards

    • Shortlisted for the SLS Peter Birks Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship 2009
    More

    Reviews & endorsements

    'This excellent book should be on the required reading list of every human rights syllabus that aims at getting under the skin of the Human Rights Act (HRA), understanding fully where it fits in Britain's system of government and wrestling with the complexities of terminology, interpretation and proper application to which it has given rise. … an indispensable guide to the first 10 years of the HRA, by the finest scholar of the first generation to have cut their academic teeth on the measure.' Professor Conor Gearty, Public Law

    'Aileen Kavanagh's book adds to [the] body of scholarship through a particularly skilful analysis of the methodology that underlies judicial decision-making in terms of the HRA. … her work probably qualifies as the most comprehensive of its kind to date. For this admirable feat the author deserves praise.' European Constitutional Law Review

    'Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act is a most significant contribution to the understanding of the exercise of the powers conferred on the judiciary in the United Kingdom by the HRA. It is likely to acquire the status of a book that no serious discussion of human rights law in the United Kingdom, or, for that matter, in Australia, can afford to ignore … it is a remarkable achievement.' The Hon Justice Pamela Tate, Australian Journal of Administrative Law

    'In this review, I have managed only to touch upon the wealth of legal analysis, historical scholarship, and philosophical argument contained within Kavanagh's impressive book. Suffice it to say that those who would like to learn something - or a bit more - about the status of constitutionalism outside North American borders and who relish sophisticated, balanced philosophical analysis informed by a thorough understanding of the relevant legal practice would be well advised to read this book.' Professor Wil Waluchow, Constitutional Commentary

    'Aileen Kavanagh is now firmly established as one of the United Kingdom's foremost constitutional scholars; she has taken a central role in expounding and justifying the practice of constitutional review described in the title of this book, doctrinally, constitutionally and theoretically … [This is] an excellent book - one that is essential reading for anyone who wants to acquire a serious and sophisticated understanding of constitutional review under the Human Rights Act.' Human Rights Law Review

    See more reviews

    Customer reviews

    04th Mar 2016 by Furqan

    it is a really nice piece of work. it clears all my doubt. love it

    Review was not posted due to profanity

    ×

    , create a review

    (If you're not , sign out)

    Please enter the right captcha value
    Please enter a star rating.
    Your review must be a minimum of 12 words.

    How do you rate this item?

    ×

    Product details

    • Date Published: May 2009
    • format: Hardback
    • isbn: 9780521761000
    • length: 470 pages
    • dimensions: 229 x 152 x 25 mm
    • weight: 0.8kg
    • availability: Available
  • Table of Contents

    1. Introduction
    Part I. Questions of Interpretation:
    2. Sections 3 and 4 HRA: the early case-law
    3. Interpretation after Ghaidan v. Mendoza
    4. Section 3(1) as a strong presumption of statutory interpretation
    5. The interplay between s.3 and s.4
    6. The duty of the courts under s.2(1)
    Part II. Questions of Deference:
    7. The nature and grounds of judicial deference
    8. Deference in particular contexts
    9. Proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act
    Part III. Questions of Constitutional Status and Legitimacy:
    10. The nature and status of the HRA
    11. Parliamentary sovereignty and the HRA
    12. Justifying constitutional review
    13. Constitutional review and participatory democracy
    14. Conclusion.

  • Author

    Aileen Kavanagh, University of Leicester
    Aileen Kavanagh is Reader in Law at the University of Leicester.

    Awards

    • Shortlisted for the SLS Peter Birks Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship 2009
    • Short-listed

Sign In

Please sign in to access your account

Cancel

Not already registered? Create an account now. ×

Sorry, this resource is locked

Please register or sign in to request access. If you are having problems accessing these resources please email lecturers@cambridge.org

Register Sign in
Please note that this file is password protected. You will be asked to input your password on the next screen.

» Proceed

You are now leaving the Cambridge University Press website. Your eBook purchase and download will be completed by our partner www.ebooks.com. Please see the permission section of the www.ebooks.com catalogue page for details of the print & copy limits on our eBooks.

Continue ×

Continue ×

Continue ×

Find content that relates to you

Join us online

This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more Close

Are you sure you want to delete your account?

This cannot be undone.

Cancel

Thank you for your feedback which will help us improve our service.

If you requested a response, we will make sure to get back to you shortly.

×
Please fill in the required fields in your feedback submission.
×